Could the social media ban for under 16’s in Australia be a step in the wrong direction in spite of its good intent?

This approach might protect young users temporarily, but it leaves the larger problem untouched: the digital landscape itself remains unregulated, unchallenged, and unaccountable. Instead of sidelining young voices, shouldn’t we focus on empowering users to shape the platforms they inhabit?

If social media isn‘t banned how can safety be ensured for our children?

How can we best navigate the challenge of regulating our children's screen time and online content? What if, instead of simply imposing rules, we took the time to listen, collaborate, and be honest with them about their digital lives? Could this approach help build a stronger foundation of trust—one that goes beyond just saying "no"?

What are our kids doing on social media? Maybe we should be be taking a deeper look…

Is a social media ban for children really the answer?

Does anyone else think that social media has got a bit bland?

Is social disconnect the reason for the political rift?

In a world where screens dominate our children's lives, parents find themselves caught in a relentless tug-of-war between safety and social acceptance.

Isn’t there more value in personal interaction and hearing other people’s voices—I mean, really listening to what they are saying? Why don’t we pick up the phone any more for a chat?

Is it fair to give parents all the responsibility for how their kids engage with online devices?

Let's not forget the real environment around us.